OpenAI Employee Says They’ve “Already Achieved AGI” Gaylord Contreras | usagoldmines.com

Only a few days after the full release of OpenAI’s o1 model, an organization staffer is now claiming that the corporate has achieved synthetic common intelligence (AGI).

“In my view,” OpenAI worker Vahid Kazemi wrote in a post on X-formerly-Twitter, “we’ve got already achieved AGI and it’s much more clear with O1.”

In case you had been anticipating a reasonably large caveat, although, you were not unsuitable.

“We have now not achieved ‘higher than any human at any job,’” he continued, “however what we’ve got is ‘higher than most people at most duties.’”

Critics will word that Kazemi is seizing on a handy and unconventional definition of AGI. He is not saying that the corporate’s AI is simpler than an individual with experience or abilities in a sure job, however that it could do such a selection of duties — even when the tip result’s doubtful — that no human can compete with the sheer breadtth.

A member of the agency’s technical employees, Kazemi went on to muse concerning the nature of LLMs and whether or not or not they’re merely “following a recipe.”

“Some say LLMs solely know how you can comply with a recipe,” he wrote. “Firstly, nobody can actually clarify what a trillion parameter deep neural web can study. However even should you imagine that, the entire scientific methodology might be summarized as a recipe: observe, hypothesize, and confirm.”

Whereas that does come off considerably defensive, it additionally will get to the guts of OpenAI’s public outlook: that merely pouring an increasing number of information and processing energy into current machine studying techniques will finally lead to a human-level intelligence.

“Good scientists can produce higher speculation [sic] primarily based on their instinct, however that instinct itself was constructed by many trial and errors,” Kazemi continued. “There’s nothing that may’t be realized with examples.”

Notably, this missive was made proper after information broke that OpenAI had removed “AGI” from the terms of its deal with Microsoft, so the enterprise implications of the assertion are unclear.

One factor’s for positive, although: we’ve not but seen an AI that may compete within the labor drive with a human employee in any severe and common means. If that occurs, the Kazemis of the world may have earned our consideration.

Extra on AGI: AI Safety Researcher Quits OpenAI, Saying Its Trajectory Alarms Her