Authors:
(1) Haleh Hayati, Division of Mechanical Engineering, Dynamics and Management Group, Eindhoven College of Expertise, The Netherlands;
(2) Nathan van de Wouw, Division of Mechanical Engineering, Dynamics and Management Group, Eindhoven College of Expertise, The Netherlands;
(3) Carlos Murguia, Division of Mechanical Engineering, Dynamics and Management Group, Eindhoven College of Expertise, The Netherlands, and with the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Robotics, Queensland College of Expertise, Brisbane, Australia.
Desk of Hyperlinks
General Guidelines for Implementation
VII. CONCLUSION
On this paper, we’ve developed a privacy-preserving framework for the implementation of distant dynamical algorithms within the cloud. It’s constructed on the synergy of random coding and system immersion instruments from management concept to guard non-public data. We’ve got devised a synthesis process to design the dynamics of a coding scheme for privateness and a higher-dimensional system referred to as goal algorithm such that trajectories of the usual dynamical algorithm are immersed/embedded in its trajectories, and it operates on randomly encoded higher-dimensional knowledge. Random coding was formulated on the consumer facet as a random change of coordinates that maps authentic non-public knowledge to a higher-dimensional house. Such coding enforces that the goal algorithm produces an encoded higher-dimensional model of the utility of the unique algorithm that may be decoded on the consumer facet.
The proposed immersion-based coding scheme offers the identical utility as the unique algorithm (i.e., when no coding is employed to guard in opposition to knowledge inference), (virtually) reveals no details about non-public knowledge, will be utilized to large-scale algorithms, is computationally environment friendly, and gives any desired degree of differential privateness with out degrading the algorithm utility.
REFERENCES
[1] S. R. Rajagopalan, L. Sankar, S. Mohajer, and H. V. Poor, “Good meter privateness: A utility-privacy framework,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Worldwide Convention on Good Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2011, pp. 190–195.
[2] O. Tan, D. Gund ¨ uz, and H. V. Poor, “Growing sensible meter privateness ¨ by way of power harvesting and storage gadgets,” IEEE Journal on Chosen Areas in Communications, vol. 31, pp. 1331–1341, 2013.
[3] Z. Huang, Y. Wang, S. Mitra, and G. E. Dullerud, “On the price of differential privateness in distributed management techniques,” in Proceedings of the third Worldwide Convention on Excessive Confidence Networked Techniques, 2014, pp. 105–114.
[4] and M. Gruteser, , and A. Alrabady, “Enhancing safety and privateness in traffic-monitoring techniques,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 5, pp. 38–46, 2006.
[5] R. H. Weber, “Web of issues – new safety and privateness challenges,” Laptop Legislation and Safety Evaluate, vol. 26, pp. 23–30, 2010.
[6] Z. Xiao and Y. Xiao, “Safety and privateness in cloud computing,” IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 843–859, 2012.
[7] J. L. Ny and G. J. Pappas, “Differentially non-public filtering,” IEEE Transactions on Automated Management, vol. 59, pp. 341–354, 2014.
[8] R. M. Ferrari and A. M. Teixeira, Security, Safety and Privateness for CyberPhysical Techniques. Springer, 2021.
[9] T. Tanaka, M. Skoglund, H. Sandberg, and Ok. H. Johansson, “Directed data as privateness measure in cloud-based management,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02802, 2017.
[10] C. Murguia, I. Shames, F. Farokhi, and D. Nesiˇ c, “On privateness of ´ quantized sensor measurements by way of additive noise,” in Proceedings of the 57th IEEE Convention on Resolution and Management (CDC), 2018.
[11] N. Wang, W. Zhou, J. Wang, Y. Guo, J. Fu, and J. Liu, “Safe and environment friendly similarity retrieval in cloud computing based mostly on homomorphic encryption,” IEEE Transactions on Data Forensics and Safety, 2024.
[12] M. S. Prakash and N. Monshizadeh, “Privateness-preserving cloud computation of algebraic riccati equations,” IEEE Management Techniques Letters, 2024.
[13] F. Farokhi, Privateness in Dynamical Techniques. Springer, 2020. [14] F. Farokhi and H. Sandberg, “Optimum privacy-preserving coverage utilizing constrained additive noise to attenuate the fisher data,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 56th Annual Convention on Resolution and Management (CDC), 2017.
[15] C. Murguia, I. Shames, F. Farokhi, D. Nesiˇ c, and H. V. Poor, “On privateness ´ of dynamical techniques: An optimum probabilistic mapping method,” IEEE Transactions on Data Forensics and Safety, 2021.
[16] H. Hayati, C. Murguia, and N. Van De Wouw, “Finite horizon privateness of stochastic dynamical techniques: A synthesis framework for gaussian mechanisms,” in 2021 sixtieth IEEE Convention on Resolution and Management (CDC). IEEE, 2021, pp. 5607–5613.
[17] H. Hayati, N. van de Wouw, and C. Murguia, “Infinite horizon privateness in networked management techniques: Utility/privateness tradeoffs and design instruments,” in 2023 62nd IEEE Convention on Resolution and Management (CDC), 2023, pp. 1847–1852.
[18] C. Dwork, “Differential privateness: A survey of outcomes,” in Idea and Purposes of Fashions of Computation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 1–19.
[19] J. Wan, A. Lopez, and M. A. A. Faruque, “Bodily layer key era: Securing wi-fi communication in automotive cyber-physical techniques,” ACM Transactions on Cyber-Bodily Techniques, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–26, 2018.
[20] Y. Shoukry, Ok. Gatsis, A. Alanwar, G. J. Pappas, S. A. Seshia, M. Srivastava, and P. Tabuada, “Privateness-aware quadratic optimization utilizing partially homomorphic encryption,” in Proceedings of the IEEE fifty fifth Convention on Resolution and Management (CDC), 2016, pp. 5053–5058.
[21] B. Joshi, B. Joshi, A. Mishra, V. Arya, A. Ok. Gupta, and D. Perakovic,´ “A comparative research of privacy-preserving homomorphic encryption strategies in cloud computing,” Worldwide Journal of Cloud Purposes and Computing (IJCAC), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.
[22] P. Paillier, “Public-key cryptosystems based mostly on composite diploma residuosity lessons,” in Worldwide convention on the speculation and functions of cryptographic strategies. Springer, 1999, pp. 223–238.
[23] C. Murguia, F. Farokhi, and I. Shames, “Safe and personal implementation of dynamic controllers utilizing semi homomorphic encryption,” IEEE Transactions on Automated Management, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 3950–3957, 2020.
[24] J. Kim, D. Kim, Y. Track, H. Shim, H. Sandberg, and Ok. H. Johansson, “Comparability of encrypted management approaches and tutorial on dynamic techniques utilizing lwe-based homomorphic encryption,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05560, 2022.
[25] A. Astolfi and R. Ortega, “Immersion and invariance: A brand new device for stabilization and adaptive management of nonlinear techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Automated management, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 590–606, 2003.
[26] H. Hayati, C. Murguia, and N. van de Wouw, “Privateness-preserving federated studying through system immersion and random matrix encryption,” in 2022 IEEE 61st Convention on Resolution and Management (CDC). IEEE, 2022, pp. 6776–6781.
[27] H. Hayati, S. Heijmans, L. Persoon, C. Murguia, and N. van de Wouw, “Mo-0304 privacy-preserving federated studying for radiotherapy functions,” Radiotherapy and Oncology, vol. 182, pp. S238–S240, 2023.
[28] H. Hayati, N. van de Wouw, and C. Murguia, “Immersion and invariance-based coding for privateness in distant anomaly detection,” IFACPapersOnLine, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 11 191–11 196, 2023.
[29] A. Astolfi, D. Karagiannis, and R. Ortega, Nonlinear and adaptive management with functions. Springer, 2008, vol. 187. [30] A. Isidori and C. Byrnes, “Output regulation of nonlinear techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Automated management, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 131–140, 1990.
[31] F. Delli Priscoli, C. Byrnes, and A. Isidori, “Output regulation of unsure nonlinear techniques,” 1997.
[32] M. W. Hirsch, S. Smale, and R. L. Devaney, Differential equations, dynamical techniques, and an introduction to chaos. Educational press, 2012.
[33] N. Schluter, P. Binfet, and M. S. Darup, “Cryptanalysis of ran- ¨ dom affine transformations for encrypted management,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06582, 2023.
[34] J. Upadhyay, “Random projections, graph sparsification, and differential privateness,” in Worldwide Convention on the Idea and Software of Cryptology and Data Safety. Springer, 2013, pp. 276–295.
[35] C. Dwork and A. Roth, “The algorithmic foundations of differential privateness,” Foundations and Developments in Theoretical Laptop Science, vol. 9, pp. 211–407, 2014.
[36] W. Diffie and M. E. Hellman, “New instructions in cryptography,” in Safe communications and uneven cryptosystems. Routledge, 2019, pp. 143–180.
[37] C. E. Shannon, “Communication concept of secrecy techniques,” The Bell system technical journal, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 656–715, 1949.
[38] C. Wang and S. Ju, “E book cipher with infinite key house,” in 2008 Worldwide Symposium on Data Science and Engineering, vol. 1. IEEE, 2008, pp. 456–459.
[39] C. Dwork, F. McSherry, Ok. Nissim, and A. Smith, “Differential privateness—a primer for the perplexed,”,” Joint UNECE/Eurostat work session on statistical knowledge confidentiality, vol. 11, 2011.
[40] B. Knott, S. Venkataraman, A. Hannun, S. Sengupta, M. Ibrahim, and L. van der Maaten, “Crypten: Safe multi-party computation meets machine studying,” Advances in Neural Data Processing Techniques, vol. 34, pp. 4961–4973, 2021.
[41] Y. Aono, T. Hayashi, L. Wang, S. Moriai et al., “Privateness-preserving deep studying through additively homomorphic encryption,” IEEE Transactions on Data Forensics and Safety, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1333–1345, 2017.
[42] Ok. Wei, J. Li, M. Ding, C. Ma, H. H. Yang, F. Farokhi, S. Jin, T. Q. Quek, and H. V. Poor, “Federated studying with differential privateness: Algorithms and efficiency evaluation,” IEEE Transactions on Data Forensics and Safety, vol. 15, pp. 3454–3469, 2020.
[43] S. Ruder, “An summary of gradient descent optimization algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747, 2016.
[44] J. Tang, C. Deng, and G.-B. Huang, “Excessive studying machine for multilayer perceptron,” IEEE transactions on neural networks and studying techniques, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 809–821, 2015.
[45] Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, “Gradient-based studying utilized to doc recognition,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278–2324, 1998.
[46] X. Jia, X. Chen, S. Xu, B. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, “Adaptive output suggestions management of nonlinear time-delay techniques with utility to chemical reactor techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 4792–4799, 2017.
This articles is written by : Nermeen Nabil Khear Abdelmalak
All rights reserved to : USAGOLDMIES . www.usagoldmines.com
You can Enjoy surfing our website categories and read more content in many fields you may like .
Why USAGoldMines ?
USAGoldMines is a comprehensive website offering the latest in financial, crypto, and technical news. With specialized sections for each category, it provides readers with up-to-date market insights, investment trends, and technological advancements, making it a valuable resource for investors and enthusiasts in the fast-paced financial world.