By Nermeen Nabil Khear 
Hedge fund manager Ray Dalio has warned that the United States is on the brink of a financial disaster, and unless drastic steps are taken to slash the deficit, the economy will spiral into collapse.
Speaking at the World Government Summit in Dubai yesterday, Dalio said, “It’s like if I was a doctor and I was speaking with you about your condition, I would say to you, this is now very, very serious. The US government needs to cut its budget deficit from 7.5% of GDP down to 3%, or face the consequences.”
Dalio warns of a debt-fueled catastrophe
As of February 13, the US gross national debt stands at $36.22 trillion. Out of this, $28.8 trillion is debt held by the public—owned by individuals, corporations, state and local governments, the Federal Reserve, foreign nations, and other non-government entities.
Dalio said he’s concerned because high debt means higher interest payments. It also makes the economy more fragile, more vulnerable to crises, and fuels inflation. “I want to alert people. I want to alert government officials,” he said. “I want to help, you know, and so I feel like the doctor, and then I would say everybody, politically… if this doesn’t happen, and we have the equivalent of, you know, an economic heart attack, or a heart attack of the bond market, then you know who’s responsible, because it can happen.”
If policymakers don’t get serious about spending cuts via Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E), the US could face a scenario where it has to borrow just to pay interest on its existing debt. That’s what Dalio calls a “debt death spiral.”
“Debt death spiral” is already happening
Dalio added that this crisis is unfolding in real time. “A debt death spiral is that part of the cycle when the debtor needs to borrow money in order to pay debt service, and it accelerates, and then everybody sees that, and they don’t want to hold the debt. That’s where we’re approaching.”
Asked what the Trump administration should do, Dalio said, “I think they recognize the problem. But recognizing a problem isn’t enough. How do you cut costs? How do you raise productivity? … Make sure that you really know what you’re doing and you’re practical, and do it on… the conservative side, because you know, how much can the cutting actually be? We’ll see.”
Dalio said D.O.G.E needs to commit to reducing the budget deficit to 3% of GDP or step aside. “So it requires the same kind of discipline as if I was to say to you, OK, you need to change how you eat, you need to change your exercise routine, and you need to do these things.”
House Republicans push for a debt limit increase
Meanwhile, Congress is scrambling to figure out a solution. House Republicans just released a budget resolution that proposes raising the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. Their plan also seeks to extend the 2017 tax cuts, increase border security and defense spending, and offset the cost with cuts to other government programs.
Speaker Mike Johnson has been rallying GOP lawmakers behind the proposal, saying on social media, “With nearly every House Republican directly engaged in this deliberative process, this resolution reflects our collective commitment to enacting the President’s full agenda—not just a part of it.”
But passing the resolution won’t be easy. “There will be ongoing debates and discussions in the coming weeks, and we remain focused on working through the process to deliver on our promises made to the American people,” Johnson added.
Not everyone is on board though. House Democrats say Republicans’ proposal will gut social programs—especially Medicaid, which covers 80 million low-income Americans. House Democratic Assistant Leader Joe Neguse slammed the plan, calling it a direct attack on working-class families.
“The GOP budget resolution and the outline for a reconciliation package are a betrayal of the middle class that would cut Medicaid, end it as we know it, and ultimately reward billionaires and corporations,” Neguse said at a press conference on Feb. 11. “We know that this rip-off plan that they’re pursuing within the Budget Committee will increase costs, not decrease costs. You don’t decrease costs by gutting Medicaid.”
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is looking to monetize the asset side of the US balance sheet, and that’s sparking a debate over what to do with the massive unrealized gains on the Treasury’s gold stock. Right now, the government values its gold holdings at just $42.22 per ounce—a price set in 1973. The real market price? Closer to $2,900 per ounce.
If Congress decided to revalue that gold at today’s price, it would instantly boost the Fed’s credit to the Treasury from $11 billion to $758 billion. Even with a conservative haircut, setting it at $2,000 per ounce would still unlock $523 billion.
That’s a massive pile of money Trump’s administration could tap into, and some investors are already hoping it means less reliance on Treasury bond issuance. Trump himself might use the proceeds to launch an American sovereign wealth fund.
Gold revaluation won’t actually shrink government debt
While revaluing gold could give the Treasury a short-term lifeline, it wouldn’t reduce the government’s total debt load. The move would shift numbers around but keep the same financial burden on investors. The best comparison? South Africa.
Last year, the country’s Reserve Bank transferred unrealized profits on foreign exchange reserves to its National Treasury. It made the books look different, but the underlying debt stayed the same.
Here’s how the US version would play out:
- Revaluing gold would increase the Fed’s credit to the Treasury. No cash would actually change hands, but the Treasury’s General Account at the Fed—essentially the government’s checking account—would get a massive boost.
- The Treasury would use that new money to pay down short-term Treasury bills. But here’s the catch: Treasury debt wouldn’t disappear. It would just turn into larger bank reserves at the Fed. Right now, the Fed is paying 4.4% interest on reserves, even higher than the 4.3% rate the Treasury is paying on its 4-week bills.
- The Fed, aiming to shrink its balance sheet, would sell off Treasury bonds to absorb the extra bank reserves. That means investors—not the government—would end up holding the same amount of Treasury debt. The numbers change, but the debt stays.
The big question is how Bessent plans to structure Treasury debt going forward. He’s been vocal about his goal to lower the 10-year bond yield but also criticized his predecessor for issuing too many short-term bills instead of locking in long-term financing. Despite that, the Treasury’s funding strategy announced on February 5 didn’t make any moves to fix that imbalance.
If Congress allows the Fed to monetize gold profits, it could give the Treasury room to shift away from short-term debt. The Fed would offload half a trillion dollars in Treasury bonds, putting more of the debt burden on investors rather than the central bank. But there’s also an option to buy back coupon securities or cut new bond issuance, keeping the maturity structure unchanged.
Cryptopolitan Academy: Are You Making These Web3 Resume Mistakes? – Find Out Here
This articles is written by : Nermeen Nabil Khear Abdelmalak
All rights reserved to : USAGOLDMIES . www.usagoldmines.com
You can Enjoy surfing our website categories and read more content in many fields you may like .
Why USAGoldMines ?
USAGoldMines is a comprehensive website offering the latest in financial, crypto, and technical news. With specialized sections for each category, it provides readers with up-to-date market insights, investment trends, and technological advancements, making it a valuable resource for investors and enthusiasts in the fast-paced financial world.