There’s one thing that Apple must fix in the next Studio Display, and it could benefit gamers and creatives alike alexblake.techradar@gmail.com (Alex Blake) | usagoldmines.com

When Apple launched the Studio Display in March 2022, it seemed that its purpose was to be an advanced monitor for creative pros who didn’t want to shell out for the $4,999 Pro Display XDR. Since then, though, it’s been over three years without a single update, leaving it suspended in an uncomfortable limbo.

When we initially reviewed the Apple Studio Display, we thought it was good but not great, with a few glaring omissions and frustrating oversights marring its final score. It’s fallen further behind in the years since, and with rival monitors offering OLED panels and higher refresh rates for lower prices, the Studio Display is in a tough spot.

Fortunately, there are rumors that Apple is working on several new monitors, one of which is likely to be a new Studio Display. Rumors have suggested it could arrive in 2026 with a mini-LED panel, making it four years between hardware updates.

And while that mini-LED screen would be a serious upgrade over the LCD panel in the current Studio Display, there’s one thing that I’d love to see above all else in the new model: a higher refresh rate. This isn’t just about gaming, although that’s part of it – this upgrade would benefit a wide range of users and scenarios, making it a change that could finally bring the Studio Display right up to date.

Gains for gamers

Let’s start with the elephant in the room, the aspect that, on the surface, perhaps makes the least sense: gaming. The Studio Display is not a gaming monitor, and Apple never claimed it was in the first place. The clue is in the name, after all: Studio Display. It’s meant for designers, photographers, and videographers – creatives, in other words, not gamers.

But in the years since the Studio Display’s 2022 launch, Apple’s gaming prowess has gone from strength to strength. We can no longer scoff when someone suggests that a MacBook is a gaming machine – it’s genuinely true. Apple has also demonstrated more of a commitment to gaming on Mac, with a new Metal dev toolkit and triple-A games featuring more frequently in Mac event presentations.

That’s mostly thanks to Apple’s in-house chips, with the latest editions offering bona fide gaming performance. Throw in frame generation, and even the most demanding games can run at high resolution and high frame rates on a Mac.

Yet right now, the Studio Display is singularly unsuited to take advantage of that. That’s because it’s limited to a measly 60Hz refresh rate, which Apple chips can go blast past these days. Pair up a Studio Display and a powerful Mac, and it’s the screen that will let you down, not the chip – and who thought we’d be saying that a few years ago?

Increasing the Studio Display’s refresh rate – ideally to the 120Hz of the latest MacBook Pros and iPhones – would significantly improve the gaming experience for Apple users. After all, Apple has already added this smooth refresh rate tech to other Macs. Why not the Studio Display?

Creative license

A higher refresh rate wouldn’t just be good for gamers – creatives would feel the benefits too. Despite the recent advances in gaming performance, Apple’s products are still primarily aimed at designers, artists, and other creatives. Upping the refresh rate could therefore bring noticeable benefits to a significant chunk of Apple’s target audience.

For example, what if you’re editing high-refresh-rate video footage on a Studio Display? Right now, you’re limited to playing it back at 60 frames per second on your monitor, which could be well below what your video is set to. That’s an obvious flaw that is likely to prompt creatives to look for alternatives. The same applies to many professionals working in game design; if you need to verify the performance of a test build, you can’t be limited by your monitor’s refresh rate.

Unlike gaming, this is a problem for the Studio Display’s core audience, which highlights the importance of fixing this issue. There’s no way that Apple can pitch the Studio Display as a great solution for creatives if it can’t serve them on such a basic level. Considering its $1,599 price tag, that’s a major problem.

It’s time for change

Whether it’s a core use case like creative work or an incidental one such as gaming, upping the Studio Display’s refresh rate would improve life for a large swathe of Apple’s users.

With the company aiming to appeal more strongly to gamers, the good news for Apple is that both creatives and gamers can benefit from smoother on-screen motion. That means it can effectively kill two birds with one stone by improving this aspect of the Studio Display.

As I mentioned earlier, current rumors suggest that Apple is looking to add mini-LED tech into the Studio Display’s monitor, but there’s no word yet on whether the refresh rate will change. We can only hope that this, too, is coming, given how much of a difference it could make – and how much it’s really needed in Apple’s monitor.

Apple already has the technology in place to make this a reality, and you can get it today in the MacBook Pro and pro-level iPhones. Now, the company just needs to bring it to the Studio Display. If it does, Apple’s device could become one of the best monitors around, for both creatives and, perhaps, gamers.

You might also like

• It’s high time the Studio Display joined the mini-LED party, and rumors suggest Apple could use the tech in its next monitor for creative pros
• Best Apple Studio Display alternatives of 2025: top monitors from 4K to 8K
• Here’s an Apple Studio Display alternative for the rest of us – the oddly-named Dough Spectrum Canvas offers 6K resolution